know it's not just an American affliction!
Larry Hamm
USA
Ken Garratt wrote:
>
>
> Scott,
> No indeed? I see. Bugger eh. Sounds to me like a big fat tick in favour
> of the WBX 2.1.
> Haha ....... you subie guys are just sooooooooooooo masochistic! Then
> again, heh why not simply delegate the engine oil checking task to your
> beloved? Now that'd go down a real treat and I'd like to be a fly on the
> wall to see the furor haha
>
> I see you raised the horsepower and reliability myths to try and get
> yourself off the hook. Interesting.
>
> On the reliability myth, I seem to recall it being reported here by an
> esteem member concerning his stock WBX 2.1. It was said it has never
> been opened up and has passed 400k clicks and still going strong. I
> believe his last longest trip was down and back to the recent DOTVW in
> Vic no problemo.
>
> So Scott, that begs my next question ok. Does that 400k plus clicks
> unopened WBX 2.1 motor suggest it's reliable or unreliable?
> Just reliable or unreliable will suffice.
>
> Cheers.
> Ken
>
> ps., I'll get back to you on the horsepower myth thingy next time ok
> Ken
>
>
>
> > To: Syncro_T3_Australia@yahoogroups.com
> > From: spbconsulting@bigpond.com
> > Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 16:03:23 +1000
> > Subject: Re: [Syncro_T3_Australia] Re: Stranded in New England
> >
> > No Ken.
> >
> > But the horsepower & reliability makes up for that small item.
> >
> > Skot
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ken Garratt " <unclekenz@hotmail.com>
> > To: <syncro_t3_australia@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 3:33 PM
> > Subject: FW: [Syncro_T3_Australia] Re: Stranded in New England
> >
> >
> > > Scott,
> > > Can you still open the small back flap and check/add/change the
> engine oil
> > > and coolant?
> > > Yes or no will suffice.
> > > Cheers.
> > > Ken