For installing the B2B jumpseat, you have to weld in some brackets on the floor and drill 4 holes to the front wheel arch.
For installing the B2B jumpseat, you have to weld in some brackets on the floor and drill 4 holes to the front wheel arch.
One thing to consider is a bolt in middle seat, these were a factory option in the 70's (T2)
http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb255/kombirod/WeekendwithHarry25May2008080.jpg
I fitted one to my T2 bus (that pic is not mine) to make it a 9 seater and had it engineered along with some other mods (child restraints, swing around front seats, long range tank etc)
I found it a useful option as I only used it a few times and still kept the walk through when unbolted.
I'm not certain on the T3, but in the T2 the bench seat was not a walk through, the tinware/frame underneath was very different. If the T3 is similar, the bench seat would not be a simple bolt in fit.
Just some things to consider.
I know what your going through with seating, it's one of the reasons I wanted a bus and not a camper, I regularly use all 7 seats in mine, and miss the extra 2 seats I had in the T2!!
Camping is done in the tent (for now)
Richard
Hi Roger, that's exactly the one, and yes how yours mounted was all factory. I have a '77 microbus (deluxe) which does not have the bulk heads behind the front seats so needed to modify to mount. I did all this with the assessor before doing the work.
What I did find at the time (QLD) was there is a big difference depending on the seat belt mounting, things become very different if the seat belt secures to the seat frame. I luckily had extra factory mounts for the additional seat belt completely separate to the seat frame, so the assessor was a little more lenient in terms of approving. If the seat belt was on a frame it would have required extensive testing and data before they would approve. The loads it apparently needed to hold he said would damage most new cars mounting points!!
Definitely the best idea is have some one happy to sign off before you do any work to avoid grief proceeding thinking it will be OK, every assessor can have different ideas on interpreting requirements.
Sounds like you made the right decision to avoid the monty python solution :)
Richard
---In Syncro_T3_Australia@yahoogroups.com, <bellrmit@...> wrote :