Now Les he is dealing with the NSW RTA!
I had dealings last year with the RTA as I wanted to concrete a footpath crossover for my driveway.
First of all I had to pay $400 to my local council so that they could give me a set of generic plans and some misinformation. The phone numbers on the council plans for my RTA contacts did not exist so it took a few weeks to find who to contact as the numbers are top secret and not in the government phone book. After a few months the RTA sent me a list of demands.
I must pay the RTA $852.50 fees with an extra $400 if I concrete on a weekent.
I then pay a $3000 bond for 12 months and if there is no damage to my work then I can apply to get that refunded. (Big chance)
I have to supply a traffic management plan prepared by a qualified designer.
I then have to apply for road occupancy approval,
Public liability insurance is required for 12 months for the amount of $20,000,000. I bet that's not cheap!
They may also require me to have a qualified traffic control person at $1800 just for one. I could need more!
This is the same department that had people stuck in their cars for up to 12 hours on the F3 motorway a few weeks ago because they are too stupid to make a decision!
It just shows what a waste of space NSW universities are.
End of rant.
Phill
> Les Harris <leslieharris@ optusnet. com.au> wrote:
>
> Peter,
>
> If it has once been legally registered as a campervan, it is implicit
> that
> the camping conversion was approved.
>
> If it was not an approved conversion, it cannot have been legally
> registered.
>
> It is an approved conversion by virtue of the fact that it has already
> been
> registered as such.
>
> No registration body can now turn round and say that it is not approved.
>
>
> No registration body can try to shift the onus back on you to show that
> it
> is an approved conversion.
>
> QED
>
> Les
>
> __